Critical analysis on two primary research papers Essay

unfavourable synopsis on twain primary research papers - Essay ExampleThe aim of this analysis is to assess these two articles and how well they follow general research standards and the use of (appropriate) methods. As a stub requirement in the presentation of a scientific argument a paper has to begin by introducing the topic chosen in foothold of a research question and a hypothesis (a former, i.e. ahead of the actual research, answer to the question). It should then proceed by clearly stating the aim of the research and how the authors jut too seek the problem by comparing to other literary source and concept. Importantly, such published articles need to define the setting and/or the sample and qualify these and the literature in terms of a particular set of methods to be used and deemed appropriate, be they person-oriented and qualitative, or of a more vicenary nature, or a mix of the two groups. Following the method, is the results-section, an analysis and word of the data collected. Finally, conclusions and recommendations are made, and including discussion how the study has tested the research question. Limitations of ones findings should also be noted (Rees, 2003). The Research fulfill Research, the search for knowledge and problem-solving, is a process of adding to knowledge (Ellen, 1984). By this understanding, research is an ongoing process. There are, however, authentic procedures to be followed and standards to be adhered to, be they of an inductive (experimental arriving at a theory based on facts) or deductive (facts are organized to match theory) nature. Based on this division, one arrives at a positivistic and relativistic stance, resulting in a contrast of explanation (deduction, positivism) and understanding (induction, relativism) (Bowling, 2002, pp. 117-32 Alexander, 1983 Gellner, 1985). The contrast has been exemplified by the different emphases placed upon structure and upon process upon positivist, empiricist observation as against intellectual inference and propositions about muddy structures of society by notions of detachment and objectivity opposed by more subjectivist views by assumptions of validity and matter of course of generalisation set off against those of ambiguity, uncertainty of findings. Such contrasts are not unilineal they often overlap (Firth, 1992, p. 215). Firths last sentence is revealing. Contrasts between a quantitative and qualitative approach are often existence set up but they do not refer to real differences in the end. It is, as other anthropologist notes, rather a matter of degree since both dimensions (induction and deduction) are indispensable for an understanding of other race and their worlds (Geertz, 1974). The alleged contrast is as straw man argument. Research question and hypothesis in the two articles 1. Brotherton, Abbott and Aggetts (2006) article is about how percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding relates to the daily lives of adult patients. Th e authors aim was to explore that question (research question) from two perspectives, that of patients and carers. Their research question assumes (hypothesis) that the two parties hold different notions and models regarding the